Blockchain Edge Data Analytics
Alright, let's get one thing straight right off the bat: this whole "Alphabet is gonna be the biggest company by 2026" prediction? It's got all the hallmarks of tech-bro hopium. I mean, come on. We're barely crawling out of one AI hype cycle, and now we're supposed to believe Google's suddenly gonna moonshot past Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Meta and everyone else? Give me a break.
The article breathlessly points to Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway investing in Alphabet as some sort of divine signal. "If Berkshire, a cash-flush firm that’s all about value investing, has a horse in the AI race with Alphabet, a broad-sweeping AI bubble thesis doesn’t hold up as much…" Oh, really? So, one investment negates the entire argument about an AI bubble? That's some seriously flawed logic. Buffett's a smart guy, sure, but he's not infallible. Remember when everyone thought he was a genius for investing in IBM? How'd that turn out?
And this whole "AI correction is healing" nonsense? The market wobbles for a week, and suddenly everything's sunshine and rainbows? Please. Volatility is the name of the game, especially in tech. Anyone who thinks they can time the market is fooling themselves.
I'm seeing a lot of people talking about the nvda stock price and wondering if they should cash out now, or hold on for dear life. Honestly, I don't know. And neither does anyone else, despite what they tell you.
Then there's the hype around Gemini 3.0. Apparently, this AI model is so revolutionary that Marc Benioff is ditching ChatGPT and declaring, "the world just changed, again." Okay, calm down, Marc. The world "changing again" is basically the tech industry's marketing slogan. Let's see some real-world results before we start crowning Google the AI champion.
And this supposed deal to bring Gemini to apple stock devices? Big deal. Apple's always looking for the next shiny object to distract people from the fact that their phones are basically the same as they were five years ago. It's a mutually beneficial relationship of hype, not necessarily a sign of Google's dominance. And who's to say Apple won't pull the plug the second someone else offers them a better deal? They've done it before.

Offcourse, even if Gemini is all that and a bag of chips, that doesn't automatically translate into google alphabet stock price domination. Remember Google Glass? Google Wave? Google+? Innovation doesn't always equal profits. Especially when Google has a habit of killing off its own promising projects on a whim.
The author gushes about Google's "hyper-monetization boom" potential, arguing that alphabet stock price today is still cheap at 31.5 times trailing P/E. But here's the thing: Google's always been good at making money from search. The question is whether they can translate that success to AI. And that's a big "if."
I mean, let's be real, Google's track record with new ventures is spotty at best. They're great at search and ads, but everything else seems to be a constant experiment that either fizzles out or gets absorbed into the Borg. Are we really supposed to believe they've suddenly cracked the code to AI monetization? I ain't buying it.
This whole prediction feels like another desperate attempt to pump up google stock. The market's been volatile, tech stocks have taken a beating, and everyone's looking for a reason to be optimistic. So, some analyst throws out a bold prediction, and the media runs with it. Rinse and repeat.
But hey, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Google really will become the biggest company in the world by 2026. Maybe Gemini will revolutionize everything, and nvidia stock will crash, and pigs will fly. But I wouldn't bet on it.
The AI "race" is a money grab, plain and simple. Don't let the hype blind you.